LogFAQs > #909990254

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Would You Rather No 57
wolfy42 10/05/18 3:31:12 AM #12:	Needs more clarification. If you destroy the world, what about animals and other life forms? Is it just all people? I'd do that one for sure if other life could continue as I think we will probably destroy everything but ourselves eventually (we have the technology to continue)...well and whatever we artificially grow/breed etc. If i could save the world and must die in the process, I would choose that if i could save it for everyone but the humans if needed (or like save the world, but 99% of humans instantly go poof and all technology and resources (fuel/refined metals etc on the surface go poof as well). If humans could live here but were forced to exist using very simple tools only, with no advanced tech...i would be ok with that. --- "did you steal my f*in signature" Helly <cite>wolfy42 posted [p:909990254] in Would You ... [t:77068254]...</cite> <quote>Needs more clarification. If you destroy the world, what about animals and other life forms? Is it just all people? I'd do that one for sure if other life could continue as I think we will probably destroy everything but ourselves eventually (we have the technology to continue)...well and whatever we artificially grow/breed etc. If i could save the world and must die in the process, I would choose that if i could save it for everyone but the humans if needed (or like save the world, but 99% of humans instantly go poof and all technology and resources (fuel/refined metals etc on the surface go poof as well). If humans could live here but were forced to exist using very simple tools only, with no advanced tech...i would be ok with that. --- "did you steal my f*in signature" Helly</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1