LogFAQs > #909035418

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	so is Olivia Munn wrong to have Steven Wilder Striegel's scene pulled?
Zeus 09/19/18 2:57:26 AM #48:	Mead posted... ernieforss posted... i have no problem what she did. i have more of a problem that she made it felt like she was the victim out of the whole mess. Did she have a right to know his history though? How so? Don't liberal-progressive states have laws protecting ex-cons from having their history scrutinized by employers? GreenKnight127 posted... Just because Olivia Munn is an attractive woman doesn't mean she should decide the entire outcome of a movie. Apparently the guy had creepy texts with an underage girl. And while that isn't acceptable under any circumstances.....does that mean guys who creepily text girls should just never be allowed to have a job? Just seems like pointless virtue-signalling to me. I can certainly see blocking him from working alone with minors, but ex-cons need to hold down jobs to support themselves otherwise it's just more money coming out of the taxpayers' pockets. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:909035418] in so is Oliv... [t:76992948]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ernieforss posted...</cite> <quote>i have no problem what she did. i have more of a problem that she made it felt like she was the victim out of the whole mess.</quote> Did she have a right to know his history though?</quote> How so? Don't liberal-progressive states have laws protecting ex-cons from having their history scrutinized by employers? <cite>GreenKnight127 posted...</cite> <quote>Just because Olivia Munn is an attractive woman doesn't mean she should decide the entire outcome of a movie. Apparently the guy had creepy texts with an underage girl. And while that isn't acceptable under any circumstances.....does that mean guys who creepily text girls should just never be allowed to have a job? Just seems like pointless virtue-signalling to me.</quote> I can certainly see blocking him from working alone with minors, but ex-cons need to hold down jobs to support themselves otherwise it's just more money coming out of the taxpayers' pockets. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1