LogFAQs > #905482521

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Uber back in the news. This time driver refused to drive due to politics.
Corrik 07/21/18 4:22:19 PM #84:	red sox 777 posted... Uber drivers are not employees (officially), so they cannot be fired. Uber could refuse to send them any more business through the app, but then it's starting to look a lot like an employer-employee relationship if they are policing this kind of thing - and Uber's foremost priority is to maintain their stance that their drivers are not employees. Kim Davis can't be fired because she's an elected official. She can only be removed by losing an election or through impeachment. You can deny work to an independent contractor. We do it all the time at our work place. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:905482521] in Uber back ... [t:76828289]...</cite> <quote><cite>red sox 777 posted...</cite> <quote>Uber drivers are not employees (officially), so they cannot be fired. Uber could refuse to send them any more business through the app, but then it's starting to look a lot like an employer-employee relationship if they are policing this kind of thing - and Uber's foremost priority is to maintain their stance that their drivers are not employees. Kim Davis can't be fired because she's an elected official. She can only be removed by losing an election or through impeachment.</quote> You can deny work to an independent contractor. We do it all the time at our work place. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1