LogFAQs > #905364856

Since we're all talking about this, I guess my take is that it's still unclear what exactly that means. Could just be Devine is intended as a witness against Manafort, could be more. The Mueller investigation doesn't really leak so I don't expect much more on this front, at least from them.

A bit hesitant to wade into some kind of involvement scale with all these people because, y'know, we don't have all the evidence in front of us, but my feelings for a long time have been along the lines of: I more or less expect Stein to be revealed to be involved/knowingly complicit but that's about it. I absolutely do think propaganda/misinformation was pushed to support Sanders because everything we've seen suggests there was a concerted effort to exacerbate existing divides in the public, and the Sanders/Clinton or Sanders/Democratic Party in general one would be a massive - and relevant/valuable - one to go for.

That said, I've never thought Sanders was knowingly involved and would be absolutely stunned if he were. I mostly extended this to his campaign staff as well but I'm willing to pause and see what happens there (staff/Devine, that is.)
---

xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out?