LogFAQs > #904832027

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	2 Young Washington State Brothers Brutally Murdered and RAPED a 16 y/o BOY!!!
Zeus 07/10/18 3:18:21 PM #43:	Kyuubi4269 posted... Oh, so your logic is they don't so they shouldn't? That's a pretty deified state for a developed country. Let's also not forget that Kazakhstan abolished death penalty, does that make it developed? Wow, so we're worse than KAZAKHSTAN? That should be a wake-up call. Kyuubi4269 posted... You don't need incentives against animals, you don't stop an animal killing by issuing warnings or bartering, you cull it as soon as possible. And note I did not say murderers should get death penalty, I referenced animals, monsters, people who commit horrific atrocities. These are people beyond reform and undeterred by police because they are sub-human, the most efficient course of action for society is their end. 1) They're people, not animals. You can reason with a person, it's a lot harder to reason with a wild animal. 2) And if they're so much scarier and more dangerous than normal criminals, why do you want to provoke them into being even more dangerous? Kyuubi4269 posted... Let's also add for the fun of it that plenty of murderers keep killing in prison, imprisoning them is guaranteeing they will take extra people with them. Because apparently an inmate's life is worth far more than an innocent civilian's or cop's? And keeping in mind that the guys who actually kill in prison aren't the horrific murderers you're suggesting be killed anyway, and more people are likely to die during the capture than might die in prison. Otherwise, it's not a "guarantee" since not every murderer who goes to prison kills somebody in there and the most prolific serial killers -- like Dahmer -- killed nobody in prison. Know what is a guarantee? That in a system where people have nothing to lose, they're going to kill additional people. Kyuubi4269 posted... More realistically speaking you don't need a fully developed impulse control to not kill, much like you don't need a degree for McDonalds. But did you really need your BS in BS to make up crap like you? --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:904832027] in 2 Young Wa... [t:76792904]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>Oh, so your logic is they don't so they shouldn't? That's a pretty deified state for a developed country. Let's also not forget that Kazakhstan abolished death penalty, does that make it developed?</quote> Wow, so we're worse than KAZAKHSTAN? That should be a wake-up call. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>You don't need incentives against animals, you don't stop an animal killing by issuing warnings or bartering, you cull it as soon as possible. And note I did not say murderers should get death penalty, I referenced animals, monsters, people who commit horrific atrocities. These are people beyond reform and undeterred by police because they are sub-human, the most efficient course of action for society is their end. </quote> 1) They're people, not animals. You can reason with a person, it's a lot harder to reason with a wild animal. 2) And if they're so much scarier and more dangerous than normal criminals, why do you want to provoke them into being even more dangerous? <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>Let's also add for the fun of it that plenty of murderers keep killing in prison, imprisoning them is guaranteeing they will take extra people with them.</quote> Because apparently an inmate's life is worth far more than an innocent civilian's or cop's? And keeping in mind that the guys who actually kill in prison aren't the horrific murderers you're suggesting be killed anyway, and more people are likely to die during the capture than might die in prison. Otherwise, it's not a "guarantee" since not every murderer who goes to prison kills somebody in there and the most prolific serial killers -- like Dahmer -- killed nobody in prison. Know what is a guarantee? That in a system where people have nothing to lose, they're going to kill additional people. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted...</cite> <quote>More realistically speaking you don't need a fully developed impulse control to not kill, much like you don't need a degree for McDonalds.</quote> But did you really need your BS in BS to make up crap like you? --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1