LogFAQs > #904777666

Moonjay posted...

Man there had better not ever be any legislation requiring special pronouns. There's no law sayng you have to call a woman she or a man he, so why should anyone else get a special law?BADoglick posted...

I don't think that the trans movement has hurt the gays, I think their fights are relatively similar.

The non binary movement however, has turned the movement into somewhat of a joke. Considering the left constantly ridicules the right for refusing to embrace science for the sake of their beliefs, it pretty much destroys the credibility of their argument when they want to claim that gender is more closely related to muh feelings than chromosomes.

The way they view sexual identity is ironically similar to the incel mentality.... men and women are chads and stacys, but they're the enlightened ones because of their position on a self contrived spectrum. When in reality, most normal people care very little about gender, and realize that some people just happen to be more or less masculine/feminine than others, without feeling the urge to create imaginary labels.

Honestly, not only is the non binary crowd setting back the lgbtq movement, they're also holding back the progressive left. Trump might be an ass, but to the average lcd American, a refusal to accept 72 genders is more normal than a refusal to accept climate change.

Except there is a scientific basis for more than two genders. Hell, just the existence of hermaphrodites alone proves that nature creates people who are more than one gender. Then there's that village where children are born female but grow penises later in life. And tons of other things. People just don't like to learn about those things because it messes with their binary gender infallible god bullshit.

And of course there are historical social precedents for recognizing more than two genders. It's not some new thing.

Ok, but 1.7% of people born intersex, and that village you're referring to, only one in 90 males experience as such and their population in the village is less than 6000. You're really reaching when using the rarest of anomalies to disprove that for literally 98.3% of the population in the world, sex/gender means either male or female and that any other deviation is merely a delusion.

I'm sorry, but dressing/doing your hair in a way that is sexually ambiguous and then calling yourself one of 72 genders doesn't change the fact that there's a 98% chance that you're actually a delusional male or female. Frankly the same applies for transgender people, but at least they seem committed to change, rather than expecting society to take gender fluidity seriously.

I don't dislike or disparage people who think/are like that, but I'm not gonna sugar coat logic and I'm not gonna go along with personal delusions.
---

BADoglick to the Max!