LogFAQs > #904767586

Man there had better not ever be any legislation requiring special pronouns. There's no law sayng you have to call a woman she or a man he, so why should anyone else get a special law?BADoglick posted...

I don't think that the trans movement has hurt the gays, I think their fights are relatively similar.

The non binary movement however, has turned the movement into somewhat of a joke. Considering the left constantly ridicules the right for refusing to embrace science for the sake of their beliefs, it pretty much destroys the credibility of their argument when they want to claim that gender is more closely related to muh feelings than chromosomes.

The way they view sexual identity is ironically similar to the incel mentality.... men and women are chads and stacys, but they're the enlightened ones because of their position on a self contrived spectrum. When in reality, most normal people care very little about gender, and realize that some people just happen to be more or less masculine/feminine than others, without feeling the urge to create imaginary labels.

Honestly, not only is the non binary crowd setting back the lgbtq movement, they're also holding back the progressive left. Trump might be an ass, but to the average lcd American, a refusal to accept 72 genders is more normal than a refusal to accept climate change.

Except there is a scientific basis for more than two genders. Hell, just the existence of hermaphrodites alone proves that nature creates people who are more than one gender. Then there's that village where children are born female but grow penises later in life. And tons of other things. People just don't like to learn about those things because it messes with their binary gender infallible god bullshit.

And of course there are historical social precedents for recognizing more than two genders. It's not some new thing.
---

`Twas brillig, and the slithy toves did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves, and the mome raths outgrabe.