LogFAQs > #904434582

Even from that article:

So does that mean we should do away with chivalry altogether? Not necessarily. As Australia's News.com points out, if a man is carrying out these actions because he believes a woman is fragile, and thus requires protection, then he's being sexist. But if he's doing it to be kind? That's just being polite.

The conclusion isnt that chivalry is sexist but that thinking you have to be courteous because a woman is weak and needs this is sexist.

Men who are considered to be sexist in a well-meaning way for example if they are chivalrous or think women need a man to protect them may be more attractive.