LogFAQs > #894040831

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why do the history books try to demonize Stalin?
Kyuubi4269 01/14/18 2:42:40 PM #25:	streamofthesky posted... Britain wouldn't have been able to halt the nazi advance on the western and African fronts w/o the weapons being sent from the U.S. Sold, not sent. America's most successful period in history was off the back of extorting the allies with unreasonable cost for supplies. In fact America joined the war because of Pearl Harbour, which was triggered by extorting Japan on oil prices to the degree that expansionism was a more financially viable strategy than dealing with America. Japan couldn't afford to be an American tributary so expanded regardless and took the first strike in the war America threatened if they refuse to subjugate themselves to them. --- RIP_Supa posted... I've seen some stuff <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:894040831] in Why do the... [t:76199146]...</cite> <quote><cite>streamofthesky posted...</cite> <quote>Britain wouldn't have been able to halt the nazi advance on the western and African fronts w/o the weapons being sent from the U.S. </quote> Sold, not sent. America's most successful period in history was off the back of extorting the allies with unreasonable cost for supplies. In fact America joined the war because of Pearl Harbour, which was triggered by extorting Japan on oil prices to the degree that expansionism was a more financially viable strategy than dealing with America. Japan couldn't afford to be an American tributary so expanded regardless and took the first strike in the war America threatened if they refuse to subjugate themselves to them. --- RIP_Supa posted... I've seen some stuff</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1