LogFAQs > #891266725

That_Happened posted...

Esrac posted...

The tl;dr for that article is "because sexism". She even makes it a point to bring up Clinton losing to Trump in the election to reinforce her argument that men are sexist. She also only barely mentions the fact that men are the ones who make the initial move for romantic encounters just to dismiss it out of hand.

Articles like this are basically useless. She makes a vague mention about men understanding or not understanding appropriate behaviour, but doesn't explain what that appropriate behaviour is. If men apparently don't understand it, maybe it should be better explained to them.

This is why I didn't post the article itself. The "Hillary Clinton wasn't elected because sexism" angle is mostly bullshit and detracts from the overall point.

I wanted to see how CE felt about a few of the questions in the survey.

I would agree with your assessment on the article. When I started reading it, I didn't necessarily agree with he'd points, but she seemed reasonable. Once she brought up the election, I kind of rolled my eyes and started to tune out.
---

http://steamcommunity.com/id/Esrac