LogFAQs > #889017692

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicTrump Admin wants to reduce funding for bc medication; increase rhythm method $
IfGodCouldDie
10/23/17 10:41:52 PM
#37:


DifferentialEquation posted...
IfGodCouldDie posted...
DifferentialEquation posted...
IfGodCouldDie posted...
DifferentialEquation posted...
I don't know if there's tons of variations. I'm know there's lots of name brands which are functionally identical. But either way, some women already report side effects from the type of pill they're taking and their doctor simply switches them to another one. There's no reason why women who want to buy their pills OTC couldn't switch to a different type.

According to Google, the price can be anywhere from $10 to $50 depending on if it's generic or a name brand and the type of pill. This would make it easier to access and would most likely drive prices down. Women who have insurance that covers the pill could still go through their doctor. I'm just talking about more options and freedom. And, in general I'd like to see people be able to but things at cheap prices on their own than needlessly go through their doctors and insurance.

As an example. Two weeks ago, I had a really bad flu. I could have immediately went to my doctor and received a prescription. It was much easier and more convenient for me to do buy a bottle of cough syrup for $6 at the grocery store. And note this is a medication that can be dangerous if misused and that some people can potentially have severe allergic reactions too.

You said that "all you're doing is putting more women at risk"? How do you know? And how do you know that there wouldn't be a lot more women that are helped by such a thing. And, beyond that, the pill is an established drug. It's relatively safe and the side effects are well known. There are plenty of dangerous things you can already buy OTC and to not allow the pill is an unnecessary infringement upon women's freedom.

I understand you are trying to be a good guy here but your stance is serverly misguided and your knowledge of the subject is lacking significantly.


What part is wrong or what do you disagree with?

Switching BC all willy nilly, picking a BC that you may not know how it interacts with whatever medication you are currently on, having someone get a prescription to get BC is hardly infringing on a woman's rights.


Alright, but there are warning labels, instructions, etc . that can be printed on medications for women to read.

ACOG also has the opinion that they should be over the counter: https://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Gynecologic-Practice/Over-the-Counter-Access-to-Oral-Contraceptives

I havent gotten a chance to let my wife read this topic yet, but I will tomorrow and have her respond.
---
Mind post. XBL:Cyanide Sucker PSN:Paters1 IGN:SuperPattyCakes
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1