LogFAQs > #887280376

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicSouth Dakota lawmakers to employed pregnant women: "you can quit."
That_Happened
09/25/17 6:13:37 PM
#53:


GhostOfTrayvon posted...
That_Happened posted...
GhostOfTrayvon posted...
Having a child should be a privilege not a right. Are you willing to argue that there aren't many unfit parents?

Don't pivot and backpedal. You said if you can't afford the time off it takes to raise a child, you shouldn't be having one. This does mean that only the rich would be having children. Do you think this is a reasonable position to have?

It doesn't mean you have to be "rich" to have a child. Nice attempt at a strawman.

It's not a strawman. You have said that in order to have a child you should first be able to afford to take several months off of work (because you're against maternity leave). Very few people can afford to do this.

So do you think it's reasonable that only upper class people should have children? Please answer this direct question instead of pivoting and changing the wording. A yes or no will do just fine. Anything beyond that means you can stfu.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1