LogFAQs > #887280237

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	South Dakota lawmakers to employed pregnant women: "you can quit."
Guide 09/25/17 6:11:11 PM #52:	GhostOfTrayvon posted... That_Happened posted... GhostOfTrayvon posted... Having a child should be a privilege not a right. Are you willing to argue that there aren't many unfit parents? Don't pivot and backpedal. You said if you can't afford the time off it takes to raise a child, you shouldn't be having one. This does mean that only the rich would be having children. Do you think this is a reasonable position to have? It doesn't mean you have to be "rich" to have a child. Nice attempt at a strawman. Yes having a child is a privilege and if you don't have the means to support the child then you weren't responsible enough in planning and having one. So you support abortion in these cases, or just having a child without income? --- [ s p e e d b o o s t ] <cite>Guide posted [p:887280237] in South Dako... [t:75806091]...</cite> <quote><cite>GhostOfTrayvon posted...</cite> <quote><cite>That_Happened posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GhostOfTrayvon posted...</cite> <quote>Having a child should be a privilege not a right. Are you willing to argue that there aren't many unfit parents?</quote> Don't pivot and backpedal. You said if you can't afford the time off it takes to raise a child, you shouldn't be having one. This does mean that only the rich would be having children. Do you think this is a reasonable position to have?</quote> It doesn't mean you have to be "rich" to have a child. Nice attempt at a strawman. Yes having a child is a privilege and if you don't have the means to support the child then you weren't responsible enough in planning and having one.</quote> So you support abortion in these cases, or just having a child without income? --- [ s p e e d b o o s t ]</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1