LogFAQs > #887279695

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	South Dakota lawmakers to employed pregnant women: "you can quit."
GhostOfTrayvon 09/25/17 6:01:27 PM #49:	That_Happened posted... GhostOfTrayvon posted... Having a child should be a privilege not a right. Are you willing to argue that there aren't many unfit parents? Don't pivot and backpedal. You said if you can't afford the time off it takes to raise a child, you shouldn't be having one. This does mean that only the rich would be having children. Do you think this is a reasonable position to have? It doesn't mean you have to be "rich" to have a child. Nice attempt at a strawman. Yes having a child is a privilege and if you don't have the means to support the child then you weren't responsible enough in planning and having one. <cite>GhostOfTrayvon posted [p:887279695] in South Dako... [t:75806091]...</cite> <quote><cite>That_Happened posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GhostOfTrayvon posted...</cite> <quote>Having a child should be a privilege not a right. Are you willing to argue that there aren't many unfit parents?</quote> Don't pivot and backpedal. You said if you can't afford the time off it takes to raise a child, you shouldn't be having one. This does mean that only the rich would be having children. Do you think this is a reasonable position to have?</quote> It doesn't mean you have to be "rich" to have a child. Nice attempt at a strawman. Yes having a child is a privilege and if you don't have the means to support the child then you weren't responsible enough in planning and having one.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1