LogFAQs > #887166908

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	South Dakota lawmakers to employed pregnant women: "you can quit."
thronedfire2 09/23/17 9:25:30 PM #19:	Knowledge_King posted... Bio1590 posted... How can you expect women to start families if they’re not even guaranteed to keep their job for doing so? You’re basically destroying the future growth of your state/country. Because families are more important than a job? Like the literal reason to work jobs is to provide for a family. ..that's what he's saying. But women aren't going to start a family if they have to choose between that and being able to keep working if they need the money --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:887166908] in South Dako... [t:75806091]...</cite> <quote><cite>Knowledge_King posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote>How can you expect women to start families if they’re not even guaranteed to keep their job for doing so? You’re basically destroying the future growth of your state/country. </quote> Because families are more important than a job? Like the literal reason to work jobs is to provide for a family.</quote> ..that's what he's saying. But women aren't going to start a family if they have to choose between that and being able to keep working if they need the money --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1