LogFAQs > #886715350

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 133: Easy D's Democratic Dalliance
Corrik 09/16/17 2:36:28 PM #39:	Jakyl25 posted... I'm not even sure what you guys are referring to. Some dude said he likes boobs on a news interview? Some dude was invited onto CNN to discuss Jemele Hill. He said he believes above all things in the First Amendment and in Boobs (which he has said multiple times beforehand). That Jemele shouldn't lose her job because she should have the right to say whatever she wants to due to the First Amendment, but that he believes ESPN has erred because they fired Curt Schilling for his comments while not firing her which is a contradiction. He basically was saying you can say whatever you want but that your job has the right to terminate you for it if they feel it is offensive. That ESPN is picking and choosing what is offensive based on political ideology. And, her cutting him off, muting him, and removing him from the show kind of played into that he should be able to say whatever he wants and it is on the company to choose what is offensive and to remove the commenter from the air. He was removed for saying he believed in boobs as a Conservative (when Griffin or whatever was not removed for repeating nipples over and over or the person who talked about piercing nipples on air), Jemele Hill was not removed for calling the President a White Supremacist. He kind of proved his point that what is offensive is being clearly dictated moreso by the political ideology the person coming from is in stating it and the results differ varying on that. Did he prove his point? --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik <cite>Corrik posted [p:886715350] in Politics C... [t:75778079]...</cite> <quote><cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>I'm not even sure what you guys are referring to. Some dude said he likes boobs on a news interview?</quote> Some dude was invited onto CNN to discuss Jemele Hill. He said he believes above all things in the First Amendment and in Boobs (which he has said multiple times beforehand). That Jemele shouldn't lose her job because she should have the right to say whatever she wants to due to the First Amendment, but that he believes ESPN has erred because they fired Curt Schilling for his comments while not firing her which is a contradiction. He basically was saying you can say whatever you want but that your job has the right to terminate you for it if they feel it is offensive. That ESPN is picking and choosing what is offensive based on political ideology. And, her cutting him off, muting him, and removing him from the show kind of played into that he should be able to say whatever he wants and it is on the company to choose what is offensive and to remove the commenter from the air. He was removed for saying he believed in boobs as a Conservative (when Griffin or whatever was not removed for repeating nipples over and over or the person who talked about piercing nipples on air), Jemele Hill was not removed for calling the President a White Supremacist. He kind of proved his point that what is offensive is being clearly dictated moreso by the political ideology the person coming from is in stating it and the results differ varying on that. Did he prove his point? --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1