LogFAQs > #883281738

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicIf appearance has nothing to do with gender identity, isn't it wrong to assume..
PK_Spam
07/20/17 3:59:27 PM
#14:


The_Beta_Male posted...
dedbus posted...
That's a good analogy except you assume they hold scissors with their hands and not their stomach crevice and you're a racist bigot to think otherwise.


this

people have gotten along fine for millennia by being normal and assuming normalcy in things that are supposed to be normal--the whole trend of getting "triggered" over such trivial nonsense as being referred to as a gender OTHER than the one you're trying to be is a relatively new thing and hopefully dies out like the fad it is within a decade or so

People use this same argument for gay people too.

The truth is, people also spent millennia hiding who they were for fear of being ostracized. People have always been this way, and there have always been trans people. They just couldn't be vocal about it.
---
"I dont know If I believe in it, real lasting happiness, All those perky, well-adjusted people you see in movies and TV shows ? I dont think they exist.'
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1