LogFAQs > #881833373

Here we go. T10P101

Leo3L posted...
"Before today ends, everyone should make their opinion known on every other player."

Followed by my post

"MI: Scum. Too much protection.

KBM: Probably also scum based on how she's misconstruing and making stuff up. She claims that "Nana has suspected me all game and done nothing", when she's done the same thing. Claims that Puns/Shad were covering for me day 1, but that's not true when you go back and read both the games and the votals, even if I were scum.

Red: don't like how he misconstrued my statements on Leo. If KBM isn't scum, it's Red.

VI: I feel reasonably fine on VI, considering I feel he hasnt done anything. Honestly, he's a lot like MI minus the protection claim - they ended day 1 together on Dowolf, they both MLd Dowolf day 2, they both gunned for me yesterday. Meh.

Leo: I think he's probably an Indy, but that doesn't really matter because there's no reason to lynch him anyways. Having even numbers means scum can't benefit from a quick hammer and they can't shoot him.

Death and Puns im putting together - could really go either way. I liked Puns yesterday, got paranoid, like him more now. I'll buy Death 100% if we see a roleblocker flip."

Bearing in mind the following:
1) My vote at the time of this post is on MI
2) Both Red and MI follow this post within 7 posts, ~30 minutes after my post, so odds of not reading the above post are minimal.

MI has no reaction to me calling him scum and me having a vote on him. This doesn't phase Red at all who just ignores my post, despite it listing MI as scum and him as my third scumspect.

This is completely counter to this new "Nana called MI scum and MI didn't respond guys!" argument that Red seems to be making.
---

This is why we need feminism.