LogFAQs > #880352729

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Possible terrorist attack on London Bridge
Erik_P 06/03/17 7:07:11 PM #47:	Kimbos_Egg posted... Doctor Foxx posted... How odd given that so many news agencies--not just those tabloids--did refer to the Manchester attack as a terrorist attack. Just not the moment it happened, because facts and research. They sure did call it that after those facts came to light. I'm sorry, i usually hold to the "wait for the facts" argument. But they literally drove into a crowd of people and slip 4 peoples throats. Argue that it might not be islamic terrorism all you want (although its almost certainly is), but its undeniable that this is a terrorist attack. The only thing that literally happened was a van drove into a crowd of people. The person slitting people's throats is unconfirmed. --- #welchingalldayerrday <cite>Erik_P posted [p:880352729] in Possible t... [t:75418223]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kimbos_Egg posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Doctor Foxx posted...</cite> <quote>How odd given that so many news agencies--not just those tabloids--did refer to the Manchester attack as a terrorist attack. Just not the moment it happened, because facts and research. They sure did call it that after those facts came to light.</quote> I'm sorry, i usually hold to the "wait for the facts" argument. But they literally drove into a crowd of people and slip 4 peoples throats. Argue that it might not be islamic terrorism all you want (although its almost certainly is), but its undeniable that this is a terrorist attack.</quote> The only thing that literally happened was a van drove into a crowd of people. The person slitting people's throats is unconfirmed. --- #welchingalldayerrday</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1