LogFAQs > #879260762

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	1995 vs 2001
BlackScythe0 05/17/17 6:48:27 AM #8:	AbsoluteDenial posted... BlackScythe0 posted... AbsoluteDenial posted... You're ranking entire years of releases, not individual games. At least try to take everything into account. The year is literally about rating which games you like the best. So yea, it is about individual games. I doubt TC, or anyone else voting for that matter, only liked 1 game from each year, though that's all he mentioned which is why I said what I said. To measure the value of an entire year of releases by just 1 game is silly. Not everyone has a wide variety of gaming interests. I'm pretty much limited to rpg, strategy, and adventure myself. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:879260762] in 1995 vs 20... [t:75352916]...</cite> <quote><cite>AbsoluteDenial posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AbsoluteDenial posted...</cite> <quote>You're ranking entire years of releases, not individual games. At least try to take everything into account.</quote> The year is literally about rating which games you like the best. So yea, it is about individual games.</quote> I doubt TC, or anyone else voting for that matter, only liked 1 game from each year, though that's all he mentioned which is why I said what I said. To measure the value of an entire year of releases by just 1 game is silly.</quote> Not everyone has a wide variety of gaming interests. I'm pretty much limited to rpg, strategy, and adventure myself.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1