LogFAQs > #878934117

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Seriously how can we stop Trump if he can just fire anyone in his way?
Metal_DK 05/11/17 10:22:07 PM #47:	Zeus posted... Source? Because I'm pretty sure that claim was debunked. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/427026/why-democrats-buried-their-debates-times-no-one-will-watch-brendan-bordelon Zeus posted... Which has nothing to do with corruption. never said it was corrupt, but its not good. corruption and not a good idea are different things. http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/272638-democrats-superdelegate-system-is-unfair-and Zeus posted... And half of today's problems are embodied in your post: The re-framing of arguments to illogical extremes. "Against gay marriage? You hate gays and want them to die!" The country has lost a sensible middle ground and reasonable discussion. and you not reading what i said and adding in dumbass shit like that to frame me does? Screw you Zeus posted... Parties do not and should require litmus tests. But otherwise sure, a lot of each party's "mission" is more branding than substance. That's why a party that's supposedly for the working class levies such high taxes on the working class while supporting job-killing legislation like NAFTA and TPP. Ive been saying in this topic the dems at the highest levels don't give a fuck about the working class..... Zeus posted... The "badness" of Trump is vastly overblown. In 08, McCain was actually very moderate and not much of a hothead; his voting record at the time was very centrist. And, of course, Romney was a "conservative" governor who presided over a liberal state who put into place what was considered the prototype for the ACA. McCain was a highly qualified, incredible candidate. Romney was okay as well. Trump, who held no previous office, was the only true unknown. I'm saying that was the sensationalist message that was being played, not about any truth to it... Zeus posted... Again, "cultural stagnation" is nonsense especially within the context you're trying to describe. The real issue was that the country wasn't going well and mainstream politics was blamed, leading to Sanders and Trump doing far better than they would within a stable system. The country not doing well IS cultural stagnation. WTH are you even saying in your pick apart attempt? --- Casual Revolution 2007 - 2016 <cite>Metal_DK posted [p:878934117] in Seriously ... [t:75335928]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Source? Because I'm pretty sure that claim was debunked. </quote> http://www.nationalreview.com/article/427026/why-democrats-buried-their-debates-times-no-one-will-watch-brendan-bordelon <cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Which has nothing to do with corruption. </quote> never said it was corrupt, but its not good. corruption and not a good idea are different things. http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/272638-democrats-superdelegate-system-is-unfair-and <cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>And half of today's problems are embodied in your post: The re-framing of arguments to illogical extremes. "Against gay marriage? You hate gays and want them to die!" The country has lost a sensible middle ground and reasonable discussion.</quote> and you not reading what i said and adding in dumbass shit like that to frame me does? Screw you <cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Parties do not and should require litmus tests. But otherwise sure, a lot of each party's "mission" is more branding than substance. That's why a party that's supposedly for the working class levies such high taxes on the working class while supporting job-killing legislation like NAFTA and TPP.</quote> Ive been saying in this topic the dems at the highest levels don't give a fuck about the working class..... <cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>The "badness" of Trump is vastly overblown. In 08, McCain was actually very moderate and not much of a hothead; his voting record at the time was very centrist. And, of course, Romney was a "conservative" governor who presided over a liberal state who put into place what was considered the prototype for the ACA. McCain was a highly qualified, incredible candidate. Romney was okay as well. Trump, who held no previous office, was the only true unknown. </quote> I'm saying that was the sensationalist message that was being played, not about any truth to it... <cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Again, "cultural stagnation" is nonsense especially within the context you're trying to describe. The real issue was that the country wasn't going well and mainstream politics was blamed, leading to Sanders and Trump doing far better than they would within a stable system.</quote> The country not doing well IS cultural stagnation. WTH are you even saying in your pick apart attempt? --- Casual Revolution 2007 - 2016</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1