LogFAQs > #877570551

Erik_P posted...

Zeus posted...

Erik_P posted...

I'll tell you when you start providing sources for your claims.

I provide sources, you just ignore them and then cite articles from sketchy publications which undermine the very argument you're trying to make.

The government is a sketchy publication now eh?

Very rarely do you cite "the government"; instead you mostly cite alt news and publications which have been busted for fraud. When you do cite the government, either your source contradicts your statement, is incomplete or of limited relevancy to the discussion,

Erik_P posted...

Also, still waiting on your source for your claim coal is cleaner and cheaper than other energy sources.

You mean the claim that you deliberately misstated to make it appear less accurate? And, as already noted, the proof is reality itself, where only restrictions --- ie, artificial measures -- have served to really reduce the US's reliance on coal. If you did have a widescale (which was an important word in my original statement, so naturally you dropped it) power source which was cheaper while also being cleaner (also an important distinction in my original statement), literally everybody would be using it without needing any restrictions because companies would make more money that way and people like cleaner products. Try using your brain for a change.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|
In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash