LogFAQs > #877118797

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Mississippi is rejecting 98% of welfare applicants, won't explain why
Twin3Turbo 04/13/17 12:05:36 PM #69:	Questionmarktarius posted... Balrog0 posted... Questionmarktarius posted... Twin3Turbo posted... Questionmarktarius posted... Twin3Turbo posted... This makes sense on the surface and is good advice prior to the kids being born, but whats the end game when saying this? Do you expect the kids to starve? Never should have shut down the orphanages. So taking kids from parents that can't afford them and shuffling them into crappy and underfunded orphanages would be a better option? Marginally, yes. because of the economies of scale you get from raising a lot of children in one place, right? Pretty much. You really haven't tried to think this out at all have you? --- https://imgflip.com/gif/di4a4 <cite>Twin3Turbo posted [p:877118797] in Mississipp... [t:75232773]...</cite> <quote><cite>Questionmarktarius posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Balrog0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Questionmarktarius posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Twin3Turbo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Questionmarktarius posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Twin3Turbo posted...</cite> <quote>This makes sense on the surface and is good advice prior to the kids being born, but whats the end game when saying this? Do you expect the kids to starve?</quote> Never should have shut down the orphanages.</quote> So taking kids from parents that can't afford them and shuffling them into crappy and underfunded orphanages would be a better option?</quote> Marginally, yes.</quote> because of the economies of scale you get from raising a lot of children in one place, right?</quote> Pretty much.</quote> You really haven't tried to think this out at all have you? --- https://imgflip.com/gif/di4a4</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1