LogFAQs > #876659032

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	First Gorsuch vote underway
ChromaticAngel 04/06/17 12:23:55 PM #35:	TheVipaGTS posted... Were they ideologically against Garland? I remember hearing that his name was floated around, by them, before Obama even nominated him....many thought Obama simply nominated him to see what the GOP would do (I disagree with that, but it was a narrative)....I feel like their refusal to vote on him had less to do with political views and more to do with "Obama nominated him....So no...Obama Bad"... Garland didn't even get a hearing. They didn't bother looking into his qualifications or asking him any questions. They just said "nope. Obama appointed so not happening." There is a party that is very clearly full of cry babies and it's not the Democrats. --- https://puu.sh/tcLsT/24f4611235.png <cite>ChromaticAngel posted [p:876659032] in First Gors... [t:75204999]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>Were they ideologically against Garland? I remember hearing that his name was floated around, by them, before Obama even nominated him....many thought Obama simply nominated him to see what the GOP would do (I disagree with that, but it was a narrative)....I feel like their refusal to vote on him had less to do with political views and more to do with "Obama nominated him....So no...Obama Bad"...</quote> Garland didn't even get a hearing. They didn't bother looking into his qualifications or asking him any questions. They just said "nope. Obama appointed so not happening." There is a party that is very clearly full of cry babies and it's not the Democrats. --- https://puu.sh/tcLsT/24f4611235.png</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1