LogFAQs > #871654189

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicLopen watches and talks about all the Royal Rumbles. And ranks them. TURBO.
Jakyl25
01/27/17 7:28:48 AM
#33:


Lopen posted...
That's probably it for tonight

Random humorous Rumble factoid that's way better than the crap WWE throws at you about numbers and pounds in the ring and whatever else.

In the rumbles I've rewatched so far, Ted Dibiase drew these numbers

1989 - 30
1990 - 1
1992 - 2
1993 - 4

Now if you consider in 1989 Dibiase cringed at his number and bought a better number from Slick, you gotta figure he's got the worst luck in Rumble history.

Although looking at who was in 1989, I'm not actually sure whose number Slick traded. I think Akeem at #23 is the only guy who Slick managed in it? Was Dibiase just greedy for that extra edge? I'm way overthinking this I'm sure.


He managed Boss Man and Akeem, who came out at 22 and 23 consecutively. So yeah, the only way it works is if Ted had one of those numbers and Slick was willing to take it + cash because it would allow the Twin Towers to come out together and guarantee they could work as a team.
---
Thank you, Eddie Guerrero.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CvGKDK2WIAAmKTf?format=jpg&name=large
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1