Assuming that he deemed what I said as adequate doesn't mean he was voting you for having a similar stance and that it wasn't also - because, again, he's very clearly voting you for other reasons, which he stated. I fail to see how you are not getting this.
His reason, as expressed in that post, is that he thought I was posting fluff content instead of adequate content. I'm not sure why we're still hung up on this point.
--
another place and time, without a great divide, and we could be flying deadly high