People aren't wrong for thinking different from me. They're wrong for not thinking about things as many steps forward as I do. When people have come up with clever ideas, I've gone through with them. For instance, it was Scep's idea to obtain the Shadow Walk ritual that allowed us to catch the World Eater and save the day with minimal casualties. The difference, Accel, is that you don't tend to think things through. You never come up with answers to points raised against your plans. You never have an answer ready when somebody asks 'and what happens afterward'? If you took five minutes to think about it, I wouldn't be as critical of you as I am. You've got the brains for it. All I ask is that you use them.
EDIT: And to provide a different example, since I know I use that one a lot: when Omega had Xenophanes move to block Ondal from the light beam, I didn't rag on him in spite of him taking lots of damage unnecessarily, because it was actually a good idea. Moving to block the druid's connection to the font of divine power was wise, as if it had worked that'd have been the end of things. My issue isn't with other people having ideas, it's with other people having ideas, having the holes in those ideas pointed out to them, and then insisting they're good anyways.
--
Twostuck, Homestuck RPG: http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/8-gamefaqs-contests/63360266