A jury in the legal system is twelve complete strangers who don't know you beforehand and know nothing about the case until its presented.
This jury is made of people you start out the game on day one with and get to know you first hand before you are ever sitting in that final seat, while they're also going for the final seat themselves.
Totally different system.
Different system, fair point. I maintain, however, that it is still their job to cast votes objectively. Pooling votes to make a lesser player win because of bitterness is not objective.
Delseban posted...
But the fact is, jurors are often not objective. Do you believe that a player should take this account when playing their game? If the jury is not objective, does the blame lie on them, or on the player, for not appealing to them?
The jury. Sorry, but it really is that black and white to me.
--
Evacuate? In our moment of triumph? I think you overestimate their chances.