LogFAQs > #962650810

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Where do you stand on Michael Jackson?
Makeveli_lives 02/14/22 5:12:36 PM #22:	CanuckCowboy posted... No it didnt. If anything the one kid providing a detailed description of Jacksons penis and the massive payout he gave to some kids and their parents indicate the opposite is true. Its also been proven he had a massive collection of animal abuse / torture images on his computer as well as files of images of underage people, and gore pics and bdsm shit in the same files. People are so willfully blind and/or ignorant when it comes to MJ and I dont get it. If you said it wasnt proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he was a child predator you'd be correct. But to say he was proven innocent is a huge fucking leap. -Kid gave an inaccurate description of his penis. That's according to official documents from the case in question. -That "massive payout" was 2 percent of his net worth at the time. Only reason he paid was because the damage was done and people like yourself have been putting out "what if" scenarios non stop for like 2 decades. -The FBI comes out every few years to publicly state that they believe he was innocent and have been doing so for. a while. --- Switch FC: SW-3917-4425-6106 PSN: PiKappaPhi769 <cite>Makeveli_lives posted [p:962650810] in Where do y... [t:79899134]...</cite> <quote>CanuckCowboy posted... </cite> <quote>No it didnt. If anything the one kid providing a detailed description of Jacksons penis and the massive payout he gave to some kids and their parents indicate the opposite is true. Its also been proven he had a massive collection of animal abuse / torture images on his computer as well as files of images of underage people, and gore pics and bdsm shit in the same files. People are so willfully blind and/or ignorant when it comes to MJ and I dont get it. If you said it wasnt proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he was a child predator you'd be correct. But to say he was proven innocent is a huge fucking leap.</quote>-Kid gave an inaccurate description of his penis. That's according to official documents from the case in question. -That "massive payout" was 2 percent of his net worth at the time. Only reason he paid was because the damage was done and people like yourself have been putting out "what if" scenarios non stop for like 2 decades. -The FBI comes out every few years to publicly state that they believe he was innocent and have been doing so for. a while. --- Switch FC: SW-3917-4425-6106 PSN: PiKappaPhi769</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1