LogFAQs > #962133042

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicHighlander question. [Spoilers for whole series, I guess?]
PrettyBoyFloyd
01/27/22 6:09:14 PM
#35:


lolife67 posted...
I'm aware of all that. It doesn't refute my point, though. If Immortals can continue to be born throughout all of history then they'll never be "only One" because their numbers are no longer finite.

It also takes away from the point of them using swords as opposed to more modern weaponry.

The Source made it to where "only One" can claim the prize, not fight down to the last.

Hell Anna and Methos are still left.

"During the journey, Duncan and Methos conclude the expression "there can be only one" does not refer to one immortal becoming the last survivor of their kind and claiming the Prize, the power of all immortals who ever lived, but actually meant to refer to the fact that only one immortal can claim the full power of the Source."

Duncan was pretty butt hurt about it too.

All that time everyone fighting and killing was for really nothing.

---
The Evil Republicans - Est.2004 - WoT
[Government Destabilizing Branch]
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1