LogFAQs > #962022951

Taharqa_ posted...

This isn't the OT rules of yesteryear where all a team had to do was put it in FG range, all the Bills had to do was keep KC out of the endzone. They hold them to a FG and they live to play another series, somebody should have made a play.

If you don't think the Bills would have gotten a touchdown if they got a possession, you don't watch football very much. Both defenses were gassed at the end. Neither side could stop a damn thing. Hence why we ended up in overtime in the first place.

The fact that Buffalo never got to touch the ball in overtime is a problem. Period. And it would have been just as infuriating if the Bills had won the coin toss and the Chiefs never got to touch the ball in OT. The rule is fucking stupid and people have been complaining about it for years. It needs to be changed.

Both teams should get at least one possession. I'm not sure why this is even up for debate. It'd be like if Baseball decided that if you score a run in the top of the 10th inning, the game just ends and the other team doesn't get to bat. You'd be laughed out of the park for even suggesting one team doesn't get a chance to respond.