LogFAQs > #961114965

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	35 y/o Wisconsin Mom is DEAD after her OWN Pitbull TORE her ARMS OFF!!!
Kyuubi4269 12/21/21 8:12:55 PM #49:	EvilMegas posted... Let's just kill everything even remotely dangerous to humans! Fairly sure you're anti-gun, so... adjl posted... she was thinking about protecting her kid. That's courageous As you already stated in the beginning, that's an autonomous response. Reflexes aren't courageous. adjl posted... That really depends on the scale of the threat and how efficient risking their life will be. Removing a violent dog before the incident is very efficient and the scale of the threat was fatal. adjl posted... If it's a matter of just one other life and there's a solid chance that sacrificing herself wouldn't actually save the kid, giving her life is not only not a moral obligation, it's not even a good idea. The other life is an innocent child, her life is the one that put the child in danger, her life is waaaaay lower so it's a no brainer she's morally obligated to try, even if she doesn't stop it. We as a society do not tolerate people who bring about death to others, whether intentionally or negligently and our laws reflect that. adjl posted... The optimal course of action would actually have been to lock the dog in with the kid and seek outside help The optimal course of action was to not have them in the same room to begin with. adjl posted... She'd likely end up jailed for that, of course, so you've got that consequence for screwing up you wanted I want the child not in danger in the first place and there to be pressure in place to ensure that this screw up wouldn't happen in the first place. If she just fled, she'd deserve much worse than prison. adjl posted... poor dad's only left with one traumatized kid to raise on his own instead of two. I'd rather two innocent children live than one, that should be the general goal of society. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:961114965] in 35 y/o Wis... [t:79819421]...</cite> <quote>EvilMegas posted...</cite> <quote>Let's just kill everything even remotely dangerous to humans!</quote> Fairly sure you're anti-gun, so... adjl posted...</cite> <quote>she was thinking about protecting her kid. That's courageous</quote> As you already stated in the beginning, that's an autonomous response. Reflexes aren't courageous. adjl posted...</cite> <quote>That really depends on the scale of the threat and how efficient risking their life will be.</quote> Removing a violent dog before the incident is very efficient and the scale of the threat was fatal. adjl posted...</cite> <quote> If it's a matter of just one other life and there's a solid chance that sacrificing herself wouldn't actually save the kid, giving her life is not only not a moral obligation, it's not even a good idea.</quote> The other life is an innocent child, her life is the one that put the child in danger, her life is waaaaay lower so it's a no brainer she's morally obligated to try, even if she doesn't stop it. We as a society do not tolerate people who bring about death to others, whether intentionally or negligently and our laws reflect that. adjl posted...</cite> <quote>The optimal course of action would actually have been to lock the dog in with the kid and seek outside help</quote> The optimal course of action was to not have them in the same room to begin with. adjl posted...</cite> <quote>She'd likely end up jailed for that, of course, so you've got that consequence for screwing up you wanted</quote> I want the child not in danger in the first place and there to be pressure in place to ensure that this screw up wouldn't happen in the first place. If she just fled, she'd deserve much worse than prison. adjl posted...</cite> <quote>poor dad's only left with one traumatized kid to raise on his own instead of two.</quote> I'd rather two innocent children live than one, that should be the general goal of society. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1