LogFAQs > #960481563

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Yet ANOTHER stand your ground fail.
LinkPizza 11/30/21 2:35:28 AM #38:	DocDelicious posted... The guy was trespassing, was clearly aggressive, tried to disarm the homeowner and take his weapon. Fairest of nexts. Letting people roll over you and do whatever they want on your property isn't a great precedent to set. Except he had a right to be there. He was picking up his son, which was probably by court order. The mom and stepdad were breaking the law by not giving the son up to him. And he tried to disarm someone that shot at the ground. If anything, he was acting in self-defense first. And honestly, the stepdad shouldn't have even brought the gun out in the first place. He's the one that escalated the whole situation. Had he not gotten his gun, no one would be dead. If they had given the guy he son like they were suppose to, no one would be dead. If they didn't want him at the house, they could have asked for the location for passing the child to the other parent to be somewhere other than their house. This isn't the bio dad's fault. It's the stepdad and moms fault... DocDelicious posted... Guy wouldn't have had to bring out a gun if the dad wasn't trespassing, or being belligerent. He wasn't trespassing as he had a reason to be there. And a right to his son. And of course he's angry. He's was suppose to have his son, and they were keeping him away. Which if they had shared custody, then the mom and stepdad were breaking the law... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:960481563] in Yet ANOTHE... [t:79786548]...</cite> <quote>DocDelicious posted...</cite> <quote>The guy was trespassing, was clearly aggressive, tried to disarm the homeowner and take his weapon. Fairest of nexts. Letting people roll over you and do whatever they want on your property isn't a great precedent to set.</quote> Except he had a right to be there. He was picking up his son, which was probably by court order. The mom and stepdad were breaking the law by not giving the son up to him. And he tried to disarm someone that shot at the ground. If anything, he was acting in self-defense first. And honestly, the stepdad shouldn't have even brought the gun out in the first place. He's the one that escalated the whole situation. Had he not gotten his gun, no one would be dead. If they had given the guy he son like they were suppose to, no one would be dead. If they didn't want him at the house, they could have asked for the location for passing the child to the other parent to be somewhere other than their house. This isn't the bio dad's fault. It's the stepdad and moms fault... DocDelicious posted...</cite> <quote>Guy wouldn't have had to bring out a gun if the dad wasn't trespassing, or being belligerent.</quote> He wasn't trespassing as he had a reason to be there. And a right to his son. And of course he's angry. He's was suppose to have his son, and they were keeping him away. Which if they had shared custody, then the mom and stepdad were breaking the law... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1