LogFAQs > #960019717

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 381: Attack On Rittenhouse
PrivateBiscuit1
11/15/21 11:46:08 AM
#232:


ChaosTonyV4 posted...
Called it.

Common sense says he violated the law, but obviously they were gonna give this kid the benefit of the doubt with the weird wording.

Can we just declare him not guilty and move on to the aftermath now?
Hey Tony.

Like everything else concerning this case, you actually don't know anything about the law in question. He wasn't violating it and never should have been charged with it. The point of contention is the length of the barrel, in which the Prosecution had never measured in any point during the investigation but charged him anyway, and the length of the barrel did not exceed the length it was to be in violation of the law.

Hope this helps.

---
I stream sometimes. Check it out!
www.twitch.tv/heroicbiz/
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1