LogFAQs > #959703875

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	take this stupid Male Hierarchy Test.
ParanoidObsessive 11/04/21 9:29:11 PM #27:	Zareth posted... The gamma description almost fits you to a T in my opinion Nah, you're lacking context. Just from the description they're using, I've actually got the social skills, money, looks and/or mental toughness needed to establish dominance. Because I've been pretty successful in life, in the aspects of life I actually care about. I'm definitely not resentful or dissatisfied with my position. And "idealism" sure as fuck isn't a "benefit" I possess in any way. Nor "sensitivity", for that matter. Also, I'm pretty satisfied with my position, and relatively frustration-free. And I only ever really feel "misunderstood" in the sense of trying to explain complex concepts to stupid people, not in the sense that term is usually applied psychologically. About the only things that do apply to me pretty strongly are intellect being a strength, valuing intelligence as a measure of worth, and being disdainful of existing organizational structures... but that alone really isn't sufficient to categorize. On the flip-side, "turning my back on many of the norms that society expects of me" applies pretty well. As does "pursuing my own path". Being unwilling to follow but also disinterested in leading? Check. Most "sigma traits" just boil down to "not giving a shit what other people think", which is generally how I've tried to live my life for about 30 years now. About the only thing in the Sigma description that doesn't fit me is "loneliness" as a drawback, because I'm actually pretty comfortable in my own skin - so I'm fine with the idea of being alone if I need to be. But I've got enough of a social support network that it's not really an issue anyway. (Though it's also worth noting that all of these classifications are mostly bullshit anyway. It's pseudo-psychology in the same way Myers-Briggs is. It's about on par with using astrology to determine someone's personality profile. A fun thing to think about when taking pointless Internet quizzes, but nothing you should ever take seriously.) --- "Wall of Text'D!" --- oldskoolplayr76 "POwned again." --- blight family <cite>ParanoidObsessive posted [p:959703875] in take this ... [t:79743686]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zareth posted...</cite> <quote>The gamma description almost fits you to a T in my opinion</quote> Nah, you're lacking context. Just from the description they're using, I've actually got the social skills, money, looks and/or mental toughness needed to establish dominance. Because I've been pretty successful in life, in the aspects of life I actually care about. I'm definitely not resentful or dissatisfied with my position. And "idealism" sure as fuck isn't a "benefit" I possess in any way. Nor "sensitivity", for that matter. Also, I'm pretty satisfied with my position, and relatively frustration-free. And I only ever really feel "misunderstood" in the sense of trying to explain complex concepts to stupid people, not in the sense that term is usually applied psychologically. About the only things that do apply to me pretty strongly are intellect being a strength, valuing intelligence as a measure of worth, and being disdainful of existing organizational structures... but that alone really isn't sufficient to categorize. On the flip-side, "turning my back on many of the norms that society expects of me" applies pretty well. As does "pursuing my own path". Being unwilling to follow but also disinterested in leading? Check. Most "sigma traits" just boil down to "not giving a shit what other people think", which is generally how I've tried to live my life for about 30 years now. About the only thing in the Sigma description that doesn't fit me is "loneliness" as a drawback, because I'm actually pretty comfortable in my own skin - so I'm fine with the idea of being alone if I need to be. But I've got enough of a social support network that it's not really an issue anyway. (Though it's also worth noting that all of these classifications are mostly bullshit anyway. It's pseudo-psychology in the same way Myers-Briggs is. It's about on par with using astrology to determine someone's personality profile. A fun thing to think about when taking pointless Internet quizzes, but nothing you should ever take seriously.) --- "Wall of Text'D!" --- oldskoolplayr76 "POwned again." --- blight family</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1