LogFAQs > #959604772

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

Because the original post says that the church has had a problem with him before but does no into detail about what that problem was.

We've seen enough Duckbear posts at this point to pretty safely presume that the anti-masking thing was the basis for the previous trespassing problems, based on his wording. If you can find any indication that this is inaccurate, I'm open to changing that presumption, but until then, believing otherwise is just baseless speculation.

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

That is not my expectation but the expectation of the god they supposedly worship.

If you actually believe that it is immoral and hypocritical of Christians to turn a literal mass murderer away from their church for their own safety, then I really don't know how to deal with you. That's simply not the way practical reality works. Nobody has that expectation, nor should anyone have that expectation, because that expectation is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. I don't know how you're so detached from reality as to think that's a reasonable suggestion, but know this: It is not. Under any circumstances.

SKARDAVNELNATE posted...

That's what I've been doing the entire time.

You really have not. You have said nothing here that actually reflects an understanding of practical reality, let alone a logical conclusion based on those constraints. You have taken a ridiculously extreme, hyperbolically literal interpretation of scripture and based your entire position around the rules you think that sets forth instead of actually thinking for half a millisecond about how realistic that interpretation is. That's not an argument. I'm not even sure what that is.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.