LogFAQs > #958778418

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	White Man Shoots a Black Man DEAD because he said his Girlfriend was HOT!!!
Zeus 10/06/21 8:57:32 PM #33:	OhhhJa posted... Yeah he's not in the wrong for trying to pick up the lady unless he knew she was taken. But we really can't say who was initially in the wrong without knowing that or what was said Whoever threw the first punch was in the wrong. Even if he was being disrespectful and an asshole, that wouldn't excuse violence. And if the fight had been broken up, there's no reason to shoot anybody because you're no longer in harm (and, honestly, in a barroom brawl when your life isn't being threatened, there's already no reason to shoot). Nichtcrawler X posted... After the initial action you called out to be wrong. The problem is the altercation and that during it the 1 guy made the decision to shoot the other. If he shot immediately during the flirting, I could see that being a crime passionnel. This is simply full on murder with a "cool-off" period in between. Yes both would be wrong and also way out of proportion for the situations and it would thus be highly unfair to blame the victim. Ducky's telling doesn't seem to specify how much time there was between things "calming down" and the shooting. The two might have just been broken up when the guy shot him. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:958778418] in White Man ... [t:79696577]...</cite> <quote>OhhhJa posted... </cite> <quote>Yeah he's not in the wrong for trying to pick up the lady unless he knew she was taken. But we really can't say who was initially in the wrong without knowing that or what was said</quote> Whoever threw the first punch was in the wrong. Even if he was being disrespectful and an asshole, that wouldn't excuse violence. And if the fight had been broken up, there's no reason to shoot anybody because you're no longer in harm (and, honestly, in a barroom brawl when your life isn't being threatened, there's already no reason to shoot). Nichtcrawler X posted... </cite> <quote>After the initial action you called out to be wrong. The problem is the altercation and that during it the 1 guy made the decision to shoot the other. If he shot immediately during the flirting, I could see that being a crime passionnel. This is simply full on murder with a "cool-off" period in between. Yes both would be wrong and also way out of proportion for the situations and it would thus be highly unfair to blame the victim.</quote> Ducky's telling doesn't seem to specify how much time there was between things "calming down" and the shooting. The two might have just been broken up when the guy shot him. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1