LogFAQs > #958608865

wwinterj25 posted...

As is he could have still got it. Your responses are pointless here.

Not at all. A vague, unquantified "he could still have died from it" that fails to account for how remote that possibility is risks misinforming people that don't know what to believe about the vaccine's efficacy, leading them to believe that it's less effective than it actually is. As somebody who does understand the situation and does know what to believe, I have a responsibility to intervene and keep those people from being misinformed. That's not pointless at all.

You, on the other hand, are saying something that not only contributes nothing of value (literally everyone already understands that the vaccine is not going to be perfect, 100% protection), but actively makes the situation works by potentially misinforming people. Again, I ask: Why would you do that?

SantaKhala posted...

https://openvaers.com/index.php

Use your words if you're trying to make a point. Don't just dump data with no context and hope it will speak for itself. It's very difficult to help you understand the situation better if you don't indicate your current understanding so the people with which you're discussing the matter can identify the holes in your knowledge that are interfering with it.

---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.