LogFAQs > #955483215

Jeff AKA Snoopy posted...

You want to argue the merits of public discourse in comparison to funding, perfectly worthwhile debate. Absolutely. It is a different claim than what you were making before.

Also, the public doesn't GAF about the efficacy of Ivermectin because the vaccines are effective and relatively safe. It has nothing to do with any sort of active censorship of the data and more to do with a total disinterest.

Not many people are arguing about the more subtle points of how one vaccine works in comparison to another unless the side effects are marketedly different. The public does not care. And if the public doesn't care it doesn't get traction online. That isn't about censorship, it is about capitalism.

Ivermectin is in youtubes terms of service about "medical misinformation"

This 100% is a censorship issue.

https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9891785?hl=en

YouTube doesn't allow content about COVID-19 that poses a serious risk of egregious harm.
...

Dont post content on YouTube if it includes any of the following:
Treatment misinformation:
Content that recommends use of Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19

And here is the peer reviewed meta analysis across 24 RCTs that concludes:

Conclusions
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin.

Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease.

The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.

https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Abstract/9000/Ivermectin_for_Prevention_and_Treatment_of.98040.aspx

Even if you think it has 0 benefit, ivermectin is on the World Health Organization's list of essential medicines, to say talking about its use poses a "a serious risk of egregious harm." is straight up gaslighting and 100% censorship.

I know you can be sus about siding with me JAKAS, but this one is pretty cut and dry.

1. World Health Ogranization calls it an essential medicine (aka it's safe af)
2. Peer reviewed meta analysis concludes "Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin."
3. Youtube rules says discussion of it constitutes "a serious risk of egregious harm." and can take remove any video they like on it and strike or ban channels that post it.

---

"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
https://imgur.com/TheGsZ9