LogFAQs > #953471967

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicDo you agree that 30 is the new 20?
MajesticFerret
05/02/21 12:07:37 PM
#45:


The 30's are almost universally considered a man's prime. Being a man in your 20's is basically dog shit. You are hustling through school and accumulating debt, when you graduate you are the most poorly paid person in your office and working twice as hard as the old fucks who get paid more than you simply because experience. You probably won't afford a home until mid to late 20's even if your degree is good and won't have a ligitimately great house probably until your 30's.

You have a brief window to party in college, but truth be told, all the people who partied super hard in college either drop out or had blow off degrees and pay the price later. Dating in 20's is harder because literally every metric of man from early 20's to 40's likes women in their 20's so you are competing with pretty much every man in the planet, most of which have a lot more to offer because you're young and broke. Meanwhile, dating women in their 30's is easy mode for a halfway decent guy in their 30's and you can still date much younger if you want, especially of you still maintained your looks, and the money will certainly be there much more than in your 20's.

So yeah, 30's really doesn't need to be the new 20's, 20's are overrated af anyways. I think this saying applies more to women as women's dating prospects definately peak in their 20's due to looks, but really has never applied to men.

---
Sanity is a one trick pony, all you get with it is rational thought, but with crazy the sky's the limit.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1