LogFAQs > #949494386

Bananana posted...

I understand. It took me about 2 years of studying it before I even actually enjoyed the music.

@SiO4 youre somewhat of a classical music buff right? care to give some feedback?

Sorry for the late response.
I don't even know I missed a topic with the name Bach in it?!
~Must have been catnapping. I've been known to do that. >_>

I do know this piece and all of Bach's Cello suites very well.
You killed it, dude, the only real critique I could make would be you got a little excited at the runs at about the 34 second period. But that really doesn't matter.

Have you tried the Prelude?

Also, it is worth noting that Bach wrote that when the Cello was in its infancy.
As I recall, he happened to have a player that he knew could pull it off so he wrote these pieces.
I think at the time it was more of a Cello de gamba. At the time it wasn't particularly normal for an instrument to be played solo, and have parts effectively accompanying themselves.

Bach was mind-blowingly ahead of his time.
You have to remember, he lived and died before Beethoven and Mozart were even born.
---

"Whatever the reason you're on Mars, I'm glad you're there, and I wish I was with you." ~Carl Sagan.
Currently playing: Flight Simulator X.~PC