LogFAQs > #948343464

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Austalia first country to abandon Covid vaccine due to HIV results
Rika_Furude 12/14/20 9:29:22 PM #100:	averagejoel posted... this new type of vaccine, which uses a chemical "shape" of the virus, has been in development for the last 15 years. it's actually less likely than the previous type to cause side effects (because they're not being injected with eggs or horse blood, or even with the virus itself). the issues have not been with safety, but with the accuracy of the chemical shape. the actual vaccine that enters your body also works its way out within a couple days. while it's true that we don't know about any "long-term effects" of this specific vaccine, there's no reason to believe that it would be any different from the other vaccines tested over the last ~15 years. it's also worth noting that we don't know for certain about any "long-term effects" of covid-19. but here are some things that people who had it and "recovered" now deal with: -lung damage -clouded thoughts and inability to focus -erectile dysfunction the lung damage is likely permanent, and we don't know enough to say whether or not that's the case for the latter two. so which seems safer to you in the long-term: a vaccine that has been in development for ~15 years that is demonstrably no more dangerous than the previous vaccine type, and and is actually less prone to causing side effects? or a virus that is has already killed many thousands of people and left many thousands more disabled? Obviously the vaccine is probably safer than the coronavirus. Not getting the coronavirus is safer than both and thats something myself and most people in Australia are in a position to accomplish --- https://imgur.com/oQHLBrx https://imgur.com/ah5IE8D https://imgur.com/USV84z9 https://imgur.com/PSjlohO <cite>Rika_Furude posted [p:948343464] in Austalia f... [t:79171871]...</cite> <quote>averagejoel posted... </cite> <quote>this new type of vaccine, which uses a chemical "shape" of the virus, has been in development for the last 15 years. it's actually less likely than the previous type to cause side effects (because they're not being injected with eggs or horse blood, or even with the virus itself). the issues have not been with safety, but with the accuracy of the chemical shape. the actual vaccine that enters your body also works its way out within a couple days. while it's true that we don't know about any "long-term effects" of this specific vaccine, there's no reason to believe that it would be any different from the other vaccines tested over the last ~15 years. it's also worth noting that we don't know for certain about any "long-term effects" of covid-19. but here are some things that people who had it and "recovered" now deal with: -lung damage -clouded thoughts and inability to focus -erectile dysfunction the lung damage is likely permanent, and we don't know enough to say whether or not that's the case for the latter two. so which seems safer to you in the long-term: a vaccine that has been in development for ~15 years that is demonstrably no more dangerous than the previous vaccine type, and and is actually less prone to causing side effects? or a virus that is has already killed many thousands of people and left many thousands more disabled?</quote>Obviously the vaccine is probably safer than the coronavirus. Not getting the coronavirus is safer than both and thats something myself and most people in Australia are in a position to accomplish --- https://imgur.com/oQHLBrx https://imgur.com/ah5IE8D https://imgur.com/USV84z9 https://imgur.com/PSjlohO</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1