LogFAQs > #945866176

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court confirmation hearings - Day 3
Clench281 10/14/20 10:04:50 PM #13:	likehelly posted... all they have to do is ask her if such and such is illegal, and then when she says it is, because it is, point out that trump did it and what her response to it would have been. they could do these questions for hours, and not only would it undermine her, it would also make her undermine the republican party. She already failed to take a stance when asked if the president can unilaterally delay an election. Legally, that's not up for interpretation, so I'm unsure why she would give a wishy washy answer. --- Take me for what I am -- who I was meant to be. And if you give a damn, take me baby, or leave me. <cite>Clench281 posted [p:945866176] in Amy Coney ... [t:79040782]...</cite> <quote>likehelly posted... </cite> <quote>all they have to do is ask her if such and such is illegal, and then when she says it is, because it is, point out that trump did it and what her response to it would have been. they could do these questions for hours, and not only would it undermine her, it would also make her undermine the republican party.</quote> She already failed to take a stance when asked if the president can unilaterally delay an election. Legally, that's not up for interpretation, so I'm unsure why she would give a wishy washy answer. --- Take me for what I am -- who I was meant to be. And if you give a damn, take me baby, or leave me.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1