LogFAQs > #944446466

SunWuKung420 posted...

Imagine being such a bigot that diversity in media is a negative.

Imagine trying to use that as a defense to a ridiculous change in awards criteria.

Lorthremar posted...

i mean i dont know why anybody is surprised by zeus, dude has been pretty open about his feelings towards certain groups of people

i mean i dont know why anybody is surprised you jump on an alt to make ridiculous claims centered around me when you have several other people condemning the change much more harshly in the same topic. It's almost like you're obsessed or something.

Also, you guys talk about high karma alts then bust out a 4k alt with 10 AMP, roflmao.

Raze_Razel posted...

But somehow, 'they' spin this as bigotry?....Why? Because we don't cow-tow to 'woke'? Because content in media makes it mandatory to represent 1% of Western Civilization, front and center, leaving no room for the 99% to identify with, so they get bored and disinterested to the point they no longer endorse the product...... it's not bigotry, it's just these corporations have no clue who their audience/customer is anymore, and their bleeding money because of it. And they can't go back to "normal", because then they too would seem like bigots too.

Kinda like how Sony tried to spin the all-female Ghostbusters reboot's terrible reception as being the result of misogynists... and likely the only people who actually bought that claim are Sunny and whoever is behind that Lorthremar alt.

Clench281 posted...

I find it hilarious that, simultaneously, people in this topic are arguing

Woke is bad because it actually harms the business
Woke is bad because it's pandering (to improve business)

Cut the crap and just admit you don't like woke regardless of the consequence, instead of hiding behind made up post-hoc rationale

I find it hilarious that you don't understand what people are saying and choose to more loudly announce the fact that you don't understand what people are saying. But then again, you're a very generous man -- you're always giving away your ignorance! XD

The posts talking about pandering are discussing how it backfires. If you read any of them, you'd pick up on that. In Razel's case, he was discussing how Gillette tried to go SJW -- which they did to pander because they thought it'd help their brand -- and instead they suffered a catastrophic loss during that period (which presumably wasn't *just* because of the ad campaign, but the timing is hilarious)

Cut the crap and just admit that you don't understand a word of what's being said, instead of trying to pretend that you know what's going on. Or, better yet, try learning about what's going on... although at that point you know your terrible opinions would change.

---

(\/)(\/)|-|
There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist.