LogFAQs > #944044761

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Have humans really been around for 200,000 years?
AssGender 08/31/20 2:56:24 PM #16:	monkmith posted... fossil records suggest so, but like all fields of science there's no definite proof. but unless you've got a time machine you've got no way to find out for sure, so the best source we have is those fossil records. Fossil are not real, its just a scultures made by ancient civilazation at that time --- Ecce homo qui est faba.Ecce homo qui est faba. Vale homo qui est faba, qui est faba, qui est faba <cite>AssGender posted [p:944044761] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>monkmith posted... </cite> <quote>fossil records suggest so, but like all fields of science there's no definite proof. but unless you've got a time machine you've got no way to find out for sure, so the best source we have is those fossil records.</quote>Fossil are not real, its just a scultures made by ancient civilazation at that time --- Ecce homo qui est faba.Ecce homo qui est faba. Vale homo qui est faba, qui est faba, qui est faba</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1