LogFAQs > #944043026

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Have humans really been around for 200,000 years?
saspa 08/31/20 2:07:14 PM #14:	monkmith posted... this. could be that fossils before the oldest we've discovered are still out there or were destroyed. could be that some geological activity we dont quite understand shifted the ones we've found around and we've ended up dating them wrong. hell there's the slim chance we're fucking up radiometric testing with samples that old and we could be completely wrong with how old they are. Hasn't all the nuclear radiation and nuclear weapons of humanity completely ruined carbon dating and radiometric testing, throwing it off by like, several thousand years? --- https://imgur.com/0UFI0T9 <cite>saspa posted [p:944043026] in Have human... [t:78944930]...</cite> <quote>monkmith posted...</cite> <quote> this. could be that fossils before the oldest we've discovered are still out there or were destroyed. could be that some geological activity we dont quite understand shifted the ones we've found around and we've ended up dating them wrong. hell there's the slim chance we're fucking up radiometric testing with samples that old and we could be completely wrong with how old they are. </quote> Hasn't all the nuclear radiation and nuclear weapons of humanity completely ruined carbon dating and radiometric testing, throwing it off by like, several thousand years? --- https://imgur.com/0UFI0T9</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1