LogFAQs > #943715155

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicSGDQ 2020 - 8/16-23 @12pm ET
turbopuns3
08/23/20 4:38:09 AM
#106:


Paratroopa1 posted...
Just because the race wasn't close doesn't mean that it didn't have the potential to be close. Both runners are skilled and one runner had the better day. The runner you're saying they should have been embarrassed to accept was the original pioneer of the category.

I am just now reading this message for the first time (passed out for a nap after I wrote the one before it lol), and, let me be clear in that I don't want to be argumentative here, but I do want to make a clarifying statement.

My point didn't have anything to do with the quality of the runner. I wasn't saying "how embarrassing they let this loser into GDQ", my point was simply, don't take races of "INSANELY" difficult categories where even the world class competitors can have such varying results with such high frequency. I love those runs (Necrodancer was awesome) but I just feel they're better left to a single runner. A blowout race makes for a worse show than one person having a rough time with a run, imo.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1