LogFAQs > #943454827

Because they both used the same method of arguing.

Really absurd analogies and right-wing claptrap.

Great example and perfect microcosom of Mal Fet was one topic about fat acceptance where some liberal user was saying it's healthy to be fat and more video game character's should be fat to reflect that.

Mal came in full of piss and vinegar about how wrong that is and how being fat is unhealthy and everyone should work out and video games should look fit if their characters are fit to be more realistic.

Then I forget how but somehow the subject of Lara Croft's enormous tits came up and someone said "Lara Croft shouldn't have boobs that big if she's supposed to be a super-athlete who does giant jumps and flips and stuff"

And instead of going "Yeah that makes sense, that's not realistic" or "Yeah fair enough but they look good and I like the character design." or "True, but my overall point is that..." Mal went on a weird rant about how women are better athelets if they have huge tits and it makes more sense for Lara to have giant knockers than a flat chest. Then to "prove" it he posted a myriad of photos (Photos I add, not videos) of women with huge boobs doing push ups and lifting weights.

And its just like "Dude..... You were right... you were winning this argument... Why the fuck are you doing this? Why are you pretending having giant tits makes you a good athelte and that's realistic? Why are you cutting off your own leg?"

And it's all because in Mal's mind there is no space for compromise or gray. It's either 100% right or wrong, he couldn't concede a thing.

And it's silly but it's not harmful or anything. I can't imagine Mal ever hurting someone. Admiral totally could and probably has
---

^ Hey now that's completely unfair!
https://imgur.com/yPw05Ob