LogFAQs > #942355798

adjl posted...

This suit is a desperate cry for attention and it's kind of hilarious how thoroughly her lawyer is taking her for a ride.

Her lawyers are exploiting her for money. They know her lawsuit is frivolous but they file it anyway. They're evil bastards.

adjl posted...

With some caveats. Refusing service on the basis of a disability that can reasonably be accommodated generally doesn't fly, so there might be a case against Starbucks for discrimination there. That's a big "might," though, since there's a very easy case to be made that not being able to wear a mask endangers staff and other customers too much to justify giving her such a non-essential service, plus it doesn't sound like she has a particularly legitimate disability (not to gatekeep disabilities, but generally speaking, a doctor's note should come from somebody with "doctor" in their professional title).

Her "doctor" is a chiropractor, i.e. a quack. Chiropractic is pseudoscience. Her discriminatory case also doesn't hold, considering it would have been illegal for the barista to serve her, considering wearing a mask is mandatory in businesses in San Diego County.

That woman is obviously mentally ill. She also shows all the signs of histrionic personality disorder. "Karens" are basically the definition of it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histrionic_personality_disorder

---

I'm French speaking.
30/Male/Quebec