LogFAQs > #942188149

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 311: Ye says Nay
xp1337 07/16/20 12:26:50 PM #118:	pyresword posted... The thing is that based on the information I have now, even if the administration lies by fabricating the data they now control, it will hardly do anything to protect them. And there are obvious benefits to this data being better streamlined. (And also I have read that this change now requires 100% of hospitals to report this data, which was not the case before, though I suppose this also could have been done without switching the reporting destination probably.) This could easily be because the information I have now is wrong, but this is what my current understanding is at any rate. I've seen agreement (indeed it's noted in some of those articles I linked) that the existing system could have done with some streamlining and centralization but reporting continuously shows health experts from hospital staff up to former CDC directors/Surgeon Generals being skeptical of this attempt to do so which makes it come off more as the administration's public shield in justifying it rather than an actual good faith improvement of the system. --- xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out? <cite>xp1337 posted [p:942188149] in Politics C... [t:78848987]...</cite> <quote>pyresword posted... </cite> <quote>The thing is that based on the information I have now, even if the administration lies by fabricating the data they now control, it will hardly do anything to protect them. And there are obvious benefits to this data being better streamlined. (And also I have read that this change now requires 100% of hospitals to report this data, which was not the case before, though I suppose this also could have been done without switching the reporting destination probably.) This could easily be because the information I have now is wrong, but this is what my current understanding is at any rate.</quote>I've seen agreement (indeed it's noted in some of those articles I linked) that the existing system could have done with some streamlining and centralization but reporting continuously shows health experts from hospital staff up to former CDC directors/Surgeon Generals being skeptical of this attempt to do so which makes it come off more as the administration's public shield in justifying it rather than an actual good faith improvement of the system. --- xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1